Poster
MDS
Accepted: 2024

Motor and Non-Motor Outcomes of Bemdaneprocel in People With Parkinson’s Disease: Results up to 24 Months From a Phase 1 Study

Henchcliffe C; Sarva H; Lozano A; Fasano A; Kalia S; Yu K; Brennan C; Stemple W; Abid N; Lampron A; Tabar V

Abstract

Objective

  • To continue evaluating the effects of bemdaneprocel on motor, non-motor, and quality of life outcomes up to 24 months post transplantation, 12 months post discontinuation of immunosuppression, in participants with PD.

Methods

  • Participants with PD, with motor symptoms inadequately controlled by standard treatments, and who were >=50 to <=78 years of age in Canada or >=60 to <=78 years of age in the United States were eligible to enroll in the study.
  • A total of 12 participants enrolled sequentially.
  • Bemdaneprocel was administered stereotactically into the posterior putamen bilaterally through a single burr hole on each side in a single session.
  • Immunosuppression was initiated during transplantation and continued for 1 year post transplantation.
  • Secondary motor outcomes included adjusted PD diary good ON time and MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF.
  • Exploratory motor and non-motor outcomes included MDS-UPDRS Part II, MDS-UPDRS Part III ON, adjusted PD diary OFF time, 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), PD Non-motor Symptom Scale (PD NMSS), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q).

Conclusions

  • Participants who received bemdaneprocel, particularly those in the high-dose cohort, experienced improvement or stability across most secondary and exploratory motor, non-motor, and quality of life outcomes through 24 months post transplantation, 12 months post discontinuation of immunosuppression.
  • Improvements in self-reported good ON times and OFF times, as well as motor function while off medication, were observed sooner after transplantation and were more pronounced in the high-dose cohort.
  • All participants have enrolled in a continued-evaluation study (NCT05897957) for ongoing evaluation of safety and efficacy.
  • These results support the continued development of bemdaneprocel for the treatment of people with Parkinson’s disease.
View references
  1. Debove I, et al. Mov Disord. 2024;39(2):235-48.
  2. Khan TS. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012;79 Suppl 2:S8-13.
  3. Kim TW, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(2):343-55.e5.
  4. Piao J, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(2):217-29.e7.
  5. Kriks S, et al. Nature. 2011;480(7378):547-51.
  6. Henchcliffe C, et al. Presented at: International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders; August 27-31, 2023; Copenhagen, Denmark.
  7. Hauser RA, et al. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2000;23(2):75-81.
  8. Goetz CG, et al. MDS-UPDRS. The MDS-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Milwaukee, WI: International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society; 2008.
  9. Cummings JL, Coffey CE. In: Coffey CE, Cummings JL, eds. The American Psychiatric Press Textbook of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.; 1994:4-15.
  10. Peto V, et al. Qual Life Res. 1995;4(3):241-8.
  11. Chaudhuri KR, et al. Mov Disord. 2007;22(13):1901-11.

Access Record

Download PDF
Study ID NCT04802733
Copy Citation